Don’t make children the losers in custody disputes

HVD: Planned fast-track procedure for judicial custody decisions does not correspond to the humanistic goal of keeping the best interests of the children in mind.

“Court decisions on parental custody that are made without hearing the parents and carefully examining the effects on the child’s welfare must not be legitimized by law”, explained Ines Scheibe from the executive committee of the Humanist Association of Germany yesterday in Berlin. The background to this is a planned new regulation in custody law, which would allow a written summary procedure to be carried out without hearing both parents and the youth welfare office and without an oral hearing if unmarried parents do not agree on joint custody. In future, courts could make decisions on child custody solely on the basis of the files. The Association of Single Mothers and Fathers recently launched a campaign against this reform, calling on legislators to abandon this regulation. The campaign involves an alliance of around a dozen organizations, including Pro Familia, the German Association of Women Lawyers and several church associations. From a humanist perspective, it is also incomprehensible why the tried and tested accelerated procedure, including oral hearings, should soon no longer be used, continued Scheibe. The HVD therefore also supports the campaign against the planned new regulation. “There is legitimate concern that children born into a conflictual parental relationship will be the losers of the new custody law,” warned Scheibe. It is essential that the children concerned, both parents and the youth welfare office remain involved in all proceedings in future if judges are to keep the child’s welfare in mind at all times. “Unfortunately, parental conflicts are sometimes carried out on the backs of the children and this usually has a negative impact on the child’s welfare. Every court custody decision is a highly individual decision that must not be made without hearing the parents. This is about the fundamental rights of parents and their children.” Ines Scheibe therefore called on humanists to take a stand now against the proposed legislation, to inform themselves about the planned reform and to co-sign the appeal of the alliance of the online custody campaign.

Share content

Our latest press releases

Climate adaptation must not depend on where one lives – The Humanist Association of Germany calls for it to be enshrined in the Constitution

The Humanist Association of Germany supports the call to enshrine climate adaptation in the Basic Law as a new joint responsibility of the federal and state governments. A society based on solidarity must ensure that protection from the consequences of the climate crisis does not depend on income, age, or place of residence.

Read more "

Record-breaking heat, record-breaking failures—it’s time to prepare for extreme weather

The Humanist Association of Germany, together with 44 other member organizations of the German Climate Alliance, has signed a statement of demands addressed to the federal government: Greater climate protection, effective heat protection, and reliable investments in climate adaptation are necessary to better protect the population from the consequences of global warming.

Read more "
Scroll to Top